Boy
Sister does double duty as my wee sister’s elf. She’s not a particularly harsh
master, which means he can get a bit uppity. One day at the Wall, he acted up
to the point when she finally demanded to know what was wrong with him. He
shrugged and tried to look innocent.
“He’s
just being obstreperous,” I said.
“What
does ‘obstreperous’ mean?” she asked.
“Difficult,”
I said.
She
gave me a Why didn’t you just say that?
look. Aloud, she muttered, “Writers.”
“Sorry
’bout that, kid.”
“It’s
okay,” she said. “I just prefer words with four letters or less. It’s quicker.”
Not
to mention more effective.
But
it got me thinking. I tend to throw big words into a conversation, mostly to
keep it interesting rather than show off, and a recent metaphor likening employee
service seniority to divorced parents switching out the kids at Christmas got
big laughs at a staff meeting. “I vote for ‘the divorced parents’ model,” one
of my more comical colleagues remarked to me the next day. (I’m lucky she
thinks I’m hilarious, as she gives me good reviews when new people join the
office.)
I
don’t restrict myself to conversations in company, either. The title of a
favourite CD gave me something to think about while I was waking up one
morning. It’s called “Nightbound” (an instrumental collection by David Lindsay
now in heavy rotation), and while the train tracks on the cover photo suggest a
traveller heading toward night, it occurred to me that the word “nightbound”
could also mean one being tied to – or bound by – the night. Or shade or shadow
or the Dark Side, or any of the other synonyms for “not day”.
Which
gives me an idea for a story ...
I
know, I know ... Writers.
No comments:
Post a Comment