I
want to write a romance.
There.
I said it.
Not
one of those formula romances, of course. That’s not my style. Besides, I tried
it once, and I couldn’t keep the characters in line. You’d think two-dimensional
people would be easy to manage, but my people were, ironically, too-dimensional. She was too independent
and he was too conflicted, so I decided to write a vampire story instead.
That
story turned out to be a romance. Well, romantic. She was independent and he was conflicted, but somehow the love
affair worked. Too bad it ended tragically. When one party is immortal and the
other one isn’t, it’s kinda doomed from the start. Mine worked without a happy
ending because, quite frankly, paranormal romance is a genre unto itself and I
can’t stick to that formula, either. I have utmost respect for authors who can
follow those rules. Trust me, it’s harder than it looks.
You
know who wrote great “outside the box” paranormal romance? Anne Rice. She set a
new standard for Gothic horror with a romantic slant—or was it Gothic romance
with a horrific slant? In any case, her work with vampires and witches was
phenomenally fabulous, crazy romantic, deeply, sensuously, gorgeously written,
and it gave me permission to blow off the doors when developing my own style.
She was my example, my mentor, my yardstick, and my escape. I learned from her
while reading everything she wrote.
So
why was she not included in the top 100 of PBS’s Great American Read? Anyone? Anyone?
Naturally,
I couldn’t resist tuning in to find out how many authors I recognized and which
books I’d read (more than I thought and not as many as I’d hoped). After the
show, I came away with a lengthy reading list ... and some big-time bitterness
on discovering the literary Queen of the Damned’s legendary Vampire Chronicles did not make the top
100 while Stephenie Meyer’s horrific-for-all-the-wrong-reasons Twilight series did.
Weeks
later, I’m still not over it. In truth, I may never be over it. Twilight led to the Fifty Shades of Grey debacle (which also made the list, gods help
us) so I guess it gets points for inspiring a new voice, but I believe it’s
also responsible for destroying an eternal genre and lowering the bar for
writing in general.
I
know I sound hysterical. I could be overreacting, I suppose, since vampires are
rarely out of fashion for long, but comparing Interview with the Vampire to Twilight
is like comparing cream to dishwater. I also understand that lists are
completely ego-based and of no value in the grand scheme, yet it truly pains me that the writer whose work
first obsessed me then compelled me to become the writer I am (undiscovered and
pretty darned good) was sacrificed in favour of a writer far less deserving of
the placement.
So,
in dark and stormy tribute to the incomparable Anne Rice, I am setting out to
write that romance.
Grrrrr.
'Too-dimensional' -- this made me chuckle with heart.
ReplyDeleteWRITE A ROMANCE!! I am waiting. Patiently. Impatiently. VERY dimensional!
I'm working on it, Bean, I promise you :)
Delete