November 30 is St Andrew’s Day. My office calendar,
rather than a Scot, told me; St. Andrew being the patron saint of Scotland, like
St. George watches over England and St. Patrick is claimed by the Irish. The
three crosses combined make a pretty nifty British flag … but did the Scots and
Irish actually want to be part of the United Kingdom? I don’t think so …
Ter and I have been watching Neil Oliver’s History
of Scotland, a ten-part series that traces the land of my ancestors from
its beginnings under the Picts to the twenty-first century. From the first
episode, a particular theme is prevalent: Scots are a difficult people to
conquer. The Vikings tried. The Romans tried. The English tried from the day
the Romans quit, employing everything from trickery to brute force and failing
on all counts. The countries were united by an irony when Elizabeth Tudor died
without issue and her Scottish cousin’s son inherited the English throne. The
country England wanted to rule now ruled England, so the tables turned and they
got cranky over how many Scots had influence in the English court. I can’t
blame James VI/I, either. The Scottish nobles hadn’t been that generous with
him, but neither had the English. According to Oliver, he had a greater vision
for the kingdom, but the only folk who want change are the ones who have
something to gain from it so he didn’t have a lot of support from his English
lords. They did, however, succeed in Anglicizing the royal Stuarts to the point
where Charles I was neither fish nor macfowl and my sweetheart, Charles II, was
so thoroughly scunnered by the overzealous Covenanters during his exile that he
visited Edinburgh but once—and reluctantly—after his Restoration.
Something else has occurred to me as the series
progresses: historically, England has needed Scotland more than Scotland needed
England and I suspect the same holds true today. Witness the frantic pandering
committed by the British PM ahead of the recent referendum on should Scotland
reclaim her independence. The fearmongering worked, but only by a small margin.
The doomsday downers were prophesying economic disaster if she broke from the
UK. Really? For which side? Economic disaster happens every day; it’s been a
given since economics took over the world. Instability inevitably accompanies
change, but eventually, all settles down and we move on. Seems to me that
Scotland has always been a republic by nature—the crowning of kings served to
(sort of) unite the clans under one banner against the English pig dogs, but
none save the kings themselves believed they were divine. The country is rich
with natural resources; it’s stunningly beautiful in the wildest ways, the
people are clever and inventive; heck, the Scottish royal court was more
cultured than the English in the time of Henry VIII. His sister’s marriage to
James IV was sought to strengthen the Tudors, not the other way round. So
somewhere along the line, Scotland began to believe that she couldn’t survive
without the English.
I think she can. So do 44.7% of her resident
population—and, surprisingly, my father, who has never given me much indication
that he favoured one route over the other. The ex-pat was so disappointed by
the outcome of the referendum that he dared to put it in writing and has
permitted me to post it here. If you ever wondered where I got my gift, here’s
your first hint. Enjoy.
* * *
So, now it is over and Scotland is no more.
Unwilling to take a chance on its own prowess and
skills but willing to cling to England’s apronstrings and risk that the
pre-vote promises will be kept by what the French once called, “Perfidious
Albion.”
It is, I think worth quoting from a well-known
source of information the derivation of that phrase as follows:
“Diplomatic sleights, duplicity, treachery and
infidelity with respect to promises made or alliances formed with other
nations, by the government of England in their pursuit of self-interest.”
It is now, unfortunately too late to say, “Scotland
beware.” You believed the crocodile tears, shameful hypocrisies and fearful
prophesies of mass unemployment and rising prices made by past masters of duplicity
and now must remain with bowed head and bent knee, begging for scraps which may
or may not be cast disdainfully from the Westminster table.
In 1305, William Wallace died in agony … and it now
appears in vain, at the hands of the English. Perhaps the first verse of a
Scottish rallying cry should be re-written, thus:
“Scots wa’ hey wi’ Wallace bled,
Scots wham Bruce has often led,
Ye hiv made yer gory bed,
Noo, lie in it....an’ dee.”
I will now remove the Scottish emblem from my
car. It might leave a dirty scar, but that is only fitting, considering
the circumstances.
* * *
I love you,
Daddy.
No comments:
Post a Comment