The
local newscast recently put up a viewers’ poll, asking the question, “Should
chilren continue to be taught cursive writing in BC schools?” I didn’t see it,
but Ter did, and her first thought was, if
it has anything to do with spelling, you guys have failed!
Spelling
should definitely stay in the curriculum, as should the mechanics of
handwriting—both printing and
cursive. While we’re at it, let’s insist on pushing the kids to do basic
arithmetic in their heads instead of with a calculator, to colour with crayons
instead of a mouse, and depend less on technology than on their own manual
abilities. You might think that cursive writing is expendable, and maybe it
is—or would be, if the aforementioned technology was more reliable, but one sizeable
electro-magnetic pulse and we’ll be back in the Stone Age. The handwritten word
will resume its status near the top of the communications food chain and how
will the millennials survive if they can’t communicate without their devices?
The
viewers’ poll resulted heavily in favour of keeping cursive in schools
(evidence, perhaps, of the median age in their audience demographic), and it
also reminded me—because I need more reminding as I get older—of my pledge to
draft blog posts by hand.
One
of my delaying tactics is my reluctance to boot and park in front of the
computer. It’s a pretty weak excuse when I can curl up on the couch with a
notebook on my knee (the original laptop) and scribble in ink until my hand
cramps. Transcribing to screen is
easier than drafting onscreen anyway.
My
handwriting is harder to read, though.
Spelling and cursive, yes!! Kids NEED it. I will always advocate both. Always.
ReplyDelete