A few weeks
ago, I discovered Chuck’s take on a debate over “art happens” versus “art is
made”. (see it here). I guess many people (probably critics or
other “experts” on creativity who think they are but are not, in fact,
themselves creative) believe that art simply happens. Once upon a time, I might
have agreed with that, but Mr. Wendig argued so colourfully to the contrary that
I had to ponder it before making up my mind for sure.
His point
is that inspiration happens and from that art is made. It’s
gratifying when the flow is smooth and time ceases to exist in its throes, but
making art is work. It takes thought and effort to get that inspired
notion off the ground. It’s totally worth it, of course, but art does not
spontaneously happen. The magic is in the idea: where it comes from, what
inspires it, and how it manifests. I admit, I’m more in love with dreaming than
doing. I envision scenes and hear conversations all the time. Getting around to
transcribing them, however … boy, I can expend more energy avoiding the
computer than it would take me to do the work.
True, if
you love what you’re doing, then it isn’t work – and I love to write. Most of
the time. Sometimes it’s just too darned hard.
Agreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading Chuck's entry, the adage "10% inspiration and 90% perspiration" made sharp-edged sense to me!
Delete